Pryers Instructed in Ankle Replacement Claim

July 1st, 2011

pryersimg1Pryers Solicitors have been instructed to investigate a potential product liability claim concerning the Biomet Ankle Evolution System (“AES”) ankle replacement components.

The AES was designed and manufactured by a French company called Transysteme SA, but imported to the UK and marketed under the Biomet name. The joint consists of two metal components, made of a cobalt/chromium alloy, with a polyethylene floating bearing sandwiched between them.

In 2004, the Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust received funding from Biomet to become a “centre of excellence” in the use of the AES ankle and many patients in the Yorkshire area were fitted with the joint.

Initial results were thought to be encouraging, but by 2009, reports were emerging that the joint was associated with a very high rate of osteolysis. This occurs when the body detects tiny particles of foreign material and reacts against them, also causing damage to healthy bone. The bone becomes soft and gradually disintegrates.

Some studies have reported osteolysis occurring in more than 50% of patients with this particular product. In some cases, the osteolysis can be seen on x-ray but causes the patient no symptoms. In other cases, it can lead to failure of the joint and destruction of the bones around the ankle. In the most extreme cases, it has required amputation of the lower leg.

The AES joint was withdrawn from the market in the UK, but was not subjected to any formal action by the medical product authorities. However, it continued to be sold in France, under the Transysteme name, until being formally recalled by the authorities in January 2011.

Pryers are now working with some of the world’s leading experts in ankle surgery to determine whether the AES is defective and whether the problems encountered could and should have been identified before the product came onto the market.

If you have suffered problems with a Biomet AES ankle replacement, please contact Richard Starkie on 01904 556600 or by email at richard.starkie@pryers-solicitors.co.uk.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace

Compensation for Midlands grandmother in unnecessary amputation

October 12th, 2009

Compensation for Midlands grandmother in unnecessary amputation

A woman whose leg was unnecessarily amputated after doctors misdiagnosed her with cancer has been awarded a six-figure compensation payout.

Doreen Nicholls, 72, found a lump in her foot and was referred to the Royal Orthopaedic Hospital in Birmingham in August 2007.

A team of orthopaedic, radiology and histology medics advised an amputation of her leg below the knee after finding symptoms of a particularly aggressive soft tissue cancer.

However, after the grandmother underwent surgery in October 2007, it was discovered that the swelling had not been cancerous after all.

Ms Nicholls sought legal advice and pursued a compensation claim against the hospital. Although it has not admitted liability, it has agreed to a six-figure payout as part of an out-of-court settlement.

"I shall never forgive the hospital for what they’ve done to me. I just want my leg back, money doesn’t mean a thing," the victim remarked.

According to recent research from Imperial College London, as many as one in six NHS patients is currently being misdiagnosed.
ADNFCR-1694-ID-19403769-ADNFCR

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace

£1m compensation for woman who had to have limb amputated

July 9th, 2009

ٟm compensation for woman who had to have limb amputated

A woman who was forced to have her leg amputated after errors occurred during a routine operation is to receive compensation.

Karen Flory, then 37, was admitted to Heath Road Hospital in February 2007 to have some swollen tissue removed from her right knee, the East Anglian Daily Times reports.

However, the blood supply to her leg was not properly monitored and Ms Flory had to have her leg amputated below the knee.

She is now unable to work and continues to feel pain in her leg.

Ipswich Hospital admitted liability and has now agreed to a payout of £1 million, which Ms Flory said will make it easier to overcome the practical tasks that her disability makes hard.

"The size of the settlement reflects the fact that I am not yet 40 and the whole of the rest of my life has been irrevocably changed by the amputation," she added.

Anyone whose operation goes wrong as a result of errors by medical staff may be eligible for compensation and should seek the advice of a solicitor specialising in clinical negligence claims.
ADNFCR-1694-ID-19257310-ADNFCR

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace

Family speak of compensation battle after child loses legs

February 6th, 2009

Family speak of compensation battle after child loses legs

A woman has urged parents to get emergency assistance as soon as they can if they are worried that their child has meningitis.

Jodie Cross, told the Daily Mail of her daughter Lydia’s ordeal in 2003, when a doctor failed to diagnose meningitis and septicaemia, which culminated in her losing her legs.

Despite having taken Lydia to her local GP when she first fell ill and requested a home visit several times, the doctor – Dr John Harrison – failed to spot the symptoms.

By the time Lydia was taken to hospital, she was seriously ill and five weeks later, she had to have a double amputation below the knee.

The family launched a claim for compensation, which was ruled upon in the high court late last year.

A judge decided that had Dr Harrison called an ambulance earlier, Lydia would not have lost her legs and he admitted 85 per cent liability.

The child was awarded a six-figure compensation settlement to provide for her future needs, including prosthetic legs.

According to the Meningitis Trust, over 500,000 people in the UK have had some form of meningitis.


ADNFCR-1694-ID-19012767-ADNFCR

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace

Warns over chemical burns after worker injury

September 15th, 2008

Warns over chemical burns after worker injury

Companies that work with chemicals and other hazardous substances have been warned to implement the correct safety procedures by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) following an incident in which an employee suffered an injury.

An unnamed employee of Oxford-based O’Brien & McIntyre LLP was standing in a trench when wet concrete poured over the top of his wellington boot.

He suffered chemical burns below the knee as a result, injuries that were compounded by the fact that there were no washing facilities on the site.

HSE inspector Tony Woodward said the lack of knowledge and appropriate safety measures was unacceptable.

"Wet cement can cause burns; these often take months to heal and in extreme cases need skin grafts or can even lead to amputation," he added.

The company was fined £500 and costs of £150 for breaching the Control of Substance Hazardous to Health Regulations 2002, although the maximum penalty for a breach of the act is a fine of £5,000.

Risks of being burnt or scalded in the workplace should be eliminated by the employer where possible, or workers should be given appropriate safety clothing.
ADNFCR-1694-ID-18780347-ADNFCR

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace