DePuy ASR Hip Replacement Products

January 14th, 2011

Pryers Solicitors now act for a large and growing group of patients who have suffered the failure of their DePuy ASR hip. Some received the joint in total hip replacement surgery and some in hip resurfacing.

Most of the cases will be brought as product liability claims against the manufacturer, DePuy, but some may become clinical negligence claims, if the evidence shows that the joint was fitted incorrectly or was not suitable for the patient.

DePuy has already withdrawn the joint from the market and guidance has been issued by DePuy and also by the British Hip Society as to what investigations should be carried out to determine whether a particular patient’s joint has failed or not.

The problem is thought to be caused by the socket’s subhemispheric shape, that is to say that it does not cover as much of the head of the joint as other products do. This means that there is less surface area and therefore higher pressure between the two parts of the joint. Also, there is a groove around the inside rim of the socket, which further reduces the surface area and increases the pressure. The increased pressure forces the body’s natural lubricating fluid out of the joint causing the metal to rub against metal, which soon wears away.

As the joint surface wears, small metal particles break away from the surface of the socket, becoming imbedded in muscles and ligaments around the joint. This causes inflammation, pain and the joint rapidly fails, causing a wide range of other symptoms. The metal particles get into the patient’s blood stream, but it is not yet known what long-term effect this might have.

If the joint has failed, revision surgery will be required, which tends to be more difficult and carries higher risks of complications. Often, a revised hip will not work as well or last as long as a first hip replacement or resurfacing, meaning that the effects of the joint failure will often be life-long.

Studies published so far have shown that the failure rate of the ASR is much higher than that of other similar products and research to be published very shortly will show that the ASR fails more than 10 times faster than the market-leading hip resurfacing product.

Pryers have commissioned expert evidence from engineers and surgeons and are working with other law firms in England, Ireland and the USA towards proving that the ASR hip is defective and obtaining fair compensation for patients who have been injured.

If you have undergone hip replacement or hip resurfacing and have symptoms of joint failure, and believe you might have had an ASR joint, please contact Richard Starkie or Richard Greensit of Pryers Solicitors.

Richard.starkie@pryers-solicitors.co.uk

Richard.greensit@pryers-solicitors.co.uk

Telephone 0800 316 0166

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace

Pryers welcomed the latest addition to their team this week

February 24th, 2010

Pryers welcomed the latest addition to their team this week. David Sears has come from a major York firm and has specialised since qualification in complex and high value personal injury claims, as well as clinical negligence claims including brain injury claims, birth injury claims and abuse claims. He is delighted to be joining their Clinical team and looks forward to continuing his specialism with such a reputable and expanding firm.  David is also a prominent member of Headway York, the local group of Headway the Brain Injury Association, and is currently their secretary.

Pryers are expanding at such a pace at the moment they are also looking for new offices to accommodate the growing team as they have three more solicitors scheduled to join them by the summer.

For more information on how Pryers can help you with your claim, please call 0800 316 0166.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace

Lancashire women consider compensation claims after cancer blunder

September 18th, 2009

Lancashire women consider compensation claims after cancer blunder

A group of women in Lancashire are said to be considering legal action after errors by a doctor led to them mistakenly being given the all-clear for breast cancer.

One radiologist at Accrington Victoria Hospital failed to spot a number of tumours and staff became concerned about previous test results.

They recalled 85 patients from the past three years and discovered that 14 had invasive breast cancer.

It is not clear if the blunders will affect the womens’ chances of survival, but they are all now undergoing treatment.

East Lancashire NHS Trust representative Rineke Schram commented: "I would like to apologise for any distress and anxiety caused."

The 14 woman affected are considering making compensation claims, the Daily Mail attests.

Anyone who has endured pain and suffering as the result of a cancer misdiagnosis may be entitled to claim compensation and should seek the advice of a solicitor specialising in clinical negligence claims.

ADNFCR-1694-ID-19367833-ADNFCR

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace

Blunder rate in Cumbrian hospitals ‘is among UK’s highest’

August 19th, 2009

Blunder rate in Cumbrian hospitals is among UKs highest

The rate of clinical errors in Cumbria’s two hospitals is among the highest in the country, it has been revealed.

Statistics released this week have shown that £5.3 million was paid out to the victims of clinical negligence by North Cumbria Acute Hospitals NHS Trust in 2008-09, the News and Star reports.

One woman who said she is not surprised by the news is Charlene Steel, whose baby suffered a brain injury because of errors at his birth at Cumberland Infirmary. She said she would travel elsewhere if she needed to use hospital services again.

This comes after figures for the UK as a whole showed that clinical negligence payouts reached £807 million last year, up by 22 per cent on the figure from 2007-08.

There were 8,885 claims brought against NHS trusts for medical blunders, it was found.

Anyone affected by errors during their hospital treatment should seek the advice of a solicitor specialising in clinical negligence claims.

ADNFCR-1694-ID-19319846-ADNFCR

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace

Drugs manufacturer could face legal action

August 13th, 2009

Drugs manufacturer could face legal action

GlaxoSmithKline could face dozens of clinical negligence claims amid fears that one of its drugs causes birth defects.

A number of cases are currently being heard in the US which claim that women who took Seroxat went on to have children with birth defects.

Although GlaxoSmithKline began to issue warnings with the antidepressant in 2005, it is alleged that the pharmaceutical company knew about the potential problems long before and did nothing.

If this is found to be the case, it could open the floodgates for similar compensation claims in the UK.

A spokesperson for GlaxoSmithKline denied the allegations, commenting: "Tragically, birth defects can occur whether or not the mother was taking medication during pregnancy."

Anyone who suffers as a result of prescribed drugs may be able to claim compensation if it can be proven that the medication caused injury or illness and should seek the advice of a solicitor.

ADNFCR-1694-ID-19310998-ADNFCR

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace