HAVS sufferers advised to make compensation claims

September 10th, 2009

HAVS sufferers advised to make compensation claims

Workers who suffer from Hand Arm Vibration Syndrome (HAVS) have been advised to seek legal advice about the possibility of making a compensation claim.

The condition, commonly known as vibration white finger, affects the blood vessels, nerves and muscles in the hands and wrists, leading to numbness and loss of movement, and often causing the fingers to change colour.

It is often the result of working with vibrating tools such as drills and chain saws.

Writing for the Daily Mail, GP Martin Scurr explained that HAVS is a recognised industrial disease, so companies should have health and safety procedures, such as providing gloves and time limits on the use of vibrating machinery, in place.

He added that "negligence is unacceptable" and recommended that anyone who has developed work-related HAVS should look into making a compensation claim.

Last month, Anthony Barry, a former toolmaker from St Helens, received £8,500 in compensation after developing the condition as a result of working with vibrating tools while employed by Ford Motor Company.

Mr Barry said his former employer had not warned him about the dangers of working with such equipment.ADNFCR-1694-ID-19354906-ADNFCR

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace

Medical negligence claim to lead to seven-figure payout

September 9th, 2009

Medical negligence claim to lead to seven-figure payout

A recycling worker from Wiltshire is in line for a seven-figure compensation payment after a botched neck operation left him severely disabled.

Michael Hart underwent surgery to remove a compressed disc at John Radcliffe Hospital in Oxford in September 2008, in what should have been a routine procedure.

However, an error by surgeons led to complications which caused irreversible damage to Mr Hart’s spinal cord.

As a result, he is now confined to a wheelchair, with only limited movement in his hands.

Following his release from hospital in April this year, he began a medical negligence claim against Oxford Radcliffe Hospital NHS Trust, which has now admitted full liability for the mistake made by its staff.

A compensation figure is still to be agreed, but it is almost certain to be more than £1 million, as it will take into account loss of earnings and the cost of long-term care for Mr Hart.

The news comes after the NHS Litigation Authority’s annual report revealed the health service spent £807 million to settle compensation claims in the 2008-09 financial year.ADNFCR-1694-ID-19353538-ADNFCR

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace

Nottingham family paid £150k compensation following misdiagnosis

September 7th, 2009

Nottingham family paid £150k compensation following misdiagnosis

Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust has paid £150,000 compensation to the family of a man who died after staff failed to diagnose a serious heart condition.

David Whittaker, 61, died after suffering a torn artery, a condition known as aortic dissection.

However, staff at Queen’s Medical Centre failed to spot this when he went to the hospital after complaining of chest pains.

Staff carried out some tests on Mr Whittaker, but did not undertake an electrocardiogram – a scan which may have identified the condition and enabled doctors to treat it appropriately.

He was discharged from hospital, but died the following day.

Mr Whittaker’s widow pursued a medical negligence claim against the trust, which admitted there had been shortcomings in his treatment and agreed a settlement, which included the six-figure compensation payout.

"[The settlement] accepts that an inappropriate failure to diagnose and treat her late husband’s aortic dissection on July 24th 2006 and that, had appropriate treatment been provided, her late husband would probably have survived," a spokesman for Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust said.

News of the payout comes just weeks after the NHS Litigation Authority revealed the NHS spent £807 million to settle compensation claims in 2008-09.ADNFCR-1694-ID-19348046-ADNFCR

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace

Leeds council pays out £10m in footpath compensation claims

August 25th, 2009

Leeds council pays out 㾶m in footpath compensation claims

New figures released under the Freedom of Information Act have revealed that Leeds City Council has paid out over £10 million in compensation to people who have been injured on faulty footpaths over the last five years.

Some 2,904 such claims were put in between 2004-05 and 2008-08 as a result of damaged or badly maintained footpaths, the Yorkshire Evening Post reports.

This was the highest number of any council in the UK and resulted in total payouts of £10,259,125.

The Liberal Democrats ordered the survey and spokesperson Norman Baker said he feels the council is simply paying claims instead of making appropriate repairs to the paths.

He added: "Too many councils seem interested only in motorists and not those who walk, cycle or take the bus."

Councils and highways agencies are responsible for the maintenance of footpaths and roads and must carry out regular checks.

If anyone suffers an accident and can prove that the section of footpath had not been recently checked, they may be eligible for personal injury compensation.
ADNFCR-1694-ID-19329027-ADNFCR

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace

£28k payout for man in drug trial

August 24th, 2009

㿈k payout for man in drug trial

A man has been awarded £28,000 in compensation after taking part in a drug trial that almost killed him.

Leslie Thomas from Ely was invited to test Vioxx by his doctor in 2003 after trials suggested that it could be a viable cure for prostate cancer, the Ely Standard reports.

However, weeks after first taking the drug, Mr Thomas was suffering from severe diarrhea and had a temperature of over 100 degrees F.

Six months after beginning the trial, he was taken to hospital where he was put on a drip and treated for septiceamia.

After being left with an incurable disease called ulcerative colitis, Mr Thomas decided to take legal action against Merck Sharpe and Dohme.

After initially offering only £2,000 for his ordeal, the company has now agreed to a payout of £28,000.

"£28,000 is not much for what we went through, but at least we won … £2,000 was an insult," Mr Thomas commented.

Earlier this month, experts warned that GlaxoSmithKline could be facing millions of pounds in compensation claims after it was found that the antidepressant Seroxat could cause birth defects.
ADNFCR-1694-ID-19326493-ADNFCR

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace