GMC concerned about patient safety

September 10th, 2009

GMC concerned about patient safety

The General Medical Council (GMC) has warned that patients may be being put at risk because of a loophole in the system for checking the backgrounds of doctors from overseas.

A medical accident which led to the death of David Gray, 70, last year highlighted the issue of doctors who trained in other countries but now work in the NHS.

Mr Gray died after a German doctor, Daniel Ubani, administered a huge overdose of diamorphine – a drug he was not familiar with using.

European law means qualified doctors from other EU countries do not have their clinical competence tested before they work in the UK, even though training standards are not uniform across the EU.

However, a shortage of doctors means many NHS trusts have little option but to use medical professionals from other countries as locum cover.

Regulations governing freedom of movement of workers also mean that authorities in other EU countries do not have to supply the GMC with details of a doctor’s work history, meaning a medical professional who has been struck off may be able to obtain a job in the UK.

The GMC’s deputy chief executive Paul Philip told the Telegraph: "We can try to get as much information as we can – and we do – but there is no legal obligation for regulators to pass on information to us. We think that creates an unacceptable level of risk."

Any medical accidents resulting from this may lead to legal action and add to the NHS’s spending to settle compensation claims, which totalled £807 million in the 2008-09 financial year.ADNFCR-1694-ID-19354908-ADNFCR

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace

Woman to sue for negligence after husband dies

December 9th, 2008

Woman to sue for negligence after husband dies

The wife of a man who was given the all-clear for cancer but later died from the disease is to sue the medical centre she claims is responsible.

Steven Davies, 47, went to see medical professionals in January 2007 and had two bowel examinations, but was told he did not have cancer, the Telegraph reports.

However, in September 2007 he returned to hospital in severe pain and surgeons found tumours that had been in his bowel for up to four years.

He died nine days later and Tracey Davies, 43, said she is to take legal action against Shepton Mallet Treatment Centre.

Ben Mak, the surgeon who carried out the initial checks on Mr Davies, has been suspended by the General Medical Council and later resigned from his position.

A spokesperson for the organisation said: "The General Medical Council has been informed about this surgeon’s work and a full independent investigation is being carried out."

Negligence may occur from delay or failure to diagnose a condition, delay or failure to treat a condition, when a treatment goes wrong, use of the wrong treatment, or failure to obtain consent.

Anyone who has suffered as a result of suspected negligence should seek the advice of a solicitor.

ADNFCR-1694-ID-18919926-ADNFCR

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace

Patients ‘considering damages claims’ after surgery

November 17th, 2008

Patients considering damages claims after surgery

A number of patients are said to be considering launching legal action against a doctor who was found to have practiced inappropriately.

Dr Ashish Dutta, a cosmetic surgeon, was issued with a warning from the General Medical Council after it was found that his actions during two operations constituted misconduct, the Sunderland Echo reports.

In both cases, Dr Ashish made inaccurate or uneven incisions during eye-bag removal.

"This was irresponsible, inappropriate and not in the best interests of your patients," the judge at the hearing ruled.

Several patients are now considering putting in claims for compensation against Dr Ashish as a result of the scarring they have suffered.

In order for a clinical negligence claim to be successful, a solicitor must establish that the surgeon breached a duty of care agreement between him or her and the patient.

Since there were no formal qualification checks on plastic surgeons prior to April 2002, it may be easier to prove negligence in plastic surgery cases than in other medical fields.

ADNFCR-1694-ID-18879031-ADNFCR

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace

Cancer patient wins payout after operation mistakes

August 1st, 2008

A breast cancer patient who claims she has been left both physically and mentally damaged after undergoing surgery has been successful in her claim for compensation.

The woman, who did not wish to be named, had mastectomy, reconstruction and breast reduction operations between October 2003 and April 2005, Yorkshire paper the Star reports.

Three initial surgical procedures were performed by different medical staff, while the reduction was performed by breast surgeon Puvaneswary Markandoo, who was suspended in July 2006 and is currently being investigated by the General Medical Council.

The patient needed treatment to rectify problems caused by the operations and still requires further corrective surgery.

In a recent development, her legal team has negotiated a settlement with Barnsley Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, which runs a 450-bed associate teaching and research hospital.

Although the precise figure has not been revealed, it is said to be a "substantial sum".
ADNFCR-1694-ID-18711558-ADNFCR

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace

GMC launches guidance for witness doctors

July 30th, 2008

Doctors have been given more help in preparing for cases in which they are called as expert witnesses.

The General Medical Council (GMC) has published its Acting as an Expert Witness guide for such doctors, detailing recent high-profile cases.

It is hoped by the council that the guidance will give doctors more confidence in their roles and also clarify what is expected of them.

"Acting as an expert witness forms part of the GMC’s wider effort to provide supplementary guidance for doctors on specific issues," said Professor Graeme Catto, president of the body.

"This document will aid doctors in their role assisting the court and the public interest."

The GMC claims it has been increasingly difficult to find doctors who will come forward as expert witnesses, particularly in child abuse cases.

One of the GMC’s other responsibilities is towards patients who have a complaint against their own doctors – such practitioners can be referred to the council.
ADNFCR-1694-ID-18708332-ADNFCR

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace