Failed Implanon contraceptive implant leads to unwanted pregnancies

January 19th, 2011

Pryers Solicitors has recently been instructed by a number of women who have unexpectedly fallen pregnant despite being fitted with the Implanon contraceptive device by their healthcare provider.

It is believed that over 550 women in the UK have fallen pregnant whilst relying on the Implanon contraceptive implant since its introduction to the UK in 1999.

Implanon was the only single-rod subdermal contraceptive implant on the UK market for over 11 years and has been extremely popular; especially amongst young women.

The implant was withdrawn from the market in October 2010 and replaced by a newer version, known as “Nexplanon”.

The manufacturer of the device advises that the 4cm single-rod device, which is situated in the inside of the upper non-dominant arm, is approximately 99% effective in preventing pregnancy. However, it appears that the device is only 99% effective if it is inserted into the arm correctly.

Implanon was discontinued within the UK market because of reported cases of non-insertion and deep-insertion. The Medicine and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), the body who oversees the UK medical products market, received a number of reports, from healthcare professionals, complaining that the Implanon applicator made it difficult to know whether the semi-rigid rod had actually been inserted into the arm or not. It was also said to be difficult to locate the implant on radiology.

In a number of cases currently being investigated by Pryers, it has become apparent that the Implanon was never actually inserted into the womans arm.

Women who believed that they have been fitted with the Implanon device and later discovered that they had not may be entitled to seek compensation for unexpected pregnancy. In many cases, the women have had to take the difficult decision to terminate the pregnancy or have had other complications during pregnancy such as still-birth and the birth of a disabled child. All women suffered with an associated psychological impact due to the pregnancies.

In some cases the Implanon has been implanted so deeply into the patient’s arm that damage has been caused to the bicep muscles and nerves necessitating surgery to remove the implant. In other cases, where the implant was very deep in the arm some women required physiotherapy and other treatment to aid recovery.

If you have become unexpectedly pregnant whilst on the Implanon implant or have been injured by implant insertion and would like to discuss the circumstances of your case please contact either Suzanne Landels or Richard Greensit who are both specialist medical solicitors on 0800 316 0166 or at richard.greensit@pryers-solicitors.co.uk / suzanne.landels@pryers-solicitors.co.uk .

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace

Family sues after child is born with disabilities

July 21st, 2009

Family sues after child is born with disabilities

A family is suing an NHS trust after their child was born with serious disabilities which were not picked up on in time for an abortion to be carried out.

Franchesca Parsons claims that Musgrove Park Hospital staff should have noticed little Rupert’s disabilities at the 20 week scan and that consequently, his was a wrongful birth because she would not have had him if she had known the extent of his problems.

She is claiming £1.5 million in interim compensation from Taunton and Somerset NHS Trust so that she can move Rupert, now five, into a specially adapted house.

Although the trust admits liability, it is disputing the amount of compensation, so a hearing is to go ahead at a later date.

According to BabyCentre.co.uk, pregnant women will be offered a detailed scan at between 18 and 22 weeks. This will check that the baby is developing normally.

Where problems are evident, an appointment for a scan with a foetal medicine specialist will usually be made within 72 hours and the options for the pregnancy can be discussed.

ADNFCR-1694-ID-19274342-ADNFCR

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace

Mother seeks compensation after Tesco blunder

July 6th, 2009

Mother seeks compensation after Tesco blunder

A young mother is seeking compensation from Tesco after her baby was put at risk of liver and kidney failure due to staff errors.

Kirsty Hensby, 22, picked up a prescription for her baby daughter Summer at Tesco after she developed a rash on her face, the Daily Mail reports.

However, the locum pharmacist labelled the bottle with a dose of 5ml three times a day instead of 3ml.

As a result, Summer was given medicine for four days that would have been more suitable for a six-year-old, putting her at risk of liver and kidney damage.

The error was only noticed after Ms Hensby went to collect a repeat prescription.

Tesco blamed the error on a locum pharmacist and said it is investigating the matter fully, as well as having sacked the offending member of staff.

Ms Hensby said the compensation offered to her by the supermarket, £600, is not enough.

"It was as though I was complaining about a can of baked beans being past their sell-by date, rather than the health of my daughter," she commented.

Tesco provides a range of pharmacy services, including repeat dispensing, repeat collection and diabetes screening.
ADNFCR-1694-ID-19252088-ADNFCR

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace

Woman ‘died due to hospital negligence’

January 15th, 2009

Woman died due to hospital negligence

A court hearing is taking place to decide whether a British woman died as a result of the actions of doctors who were treating her.

Patricia Leighton, 51, had rheumatoid arthritis and was admitted to hospital in July 1998 suffering from pain from a bunion, the Birmingham Post reports.

However, she was given a shot of adrenaline which did not react well to the medicine she was already taking and she died.

The family’s legal team claim that Dr Priya Ramnath gave Ms Leighton the adrenaline even though two doctors present told her not to and that she did not refer to the consultant in charge.

Dr Ramnath denies the allegations of clinical negligence and the case continues.

If the doctor is found guilty, the family of Ms Leighton could be eligible for compensation from the NHS trust responsible for the hospital where she died.

Clinical negligence occurs when a professional in the health service provides care that is deemed to be below standard and this causes physical injury, death or distress.

ADNFCR-1694-ID-18974835-ADNFCR

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace

Medical negligence claim results in compensation payout

September 24th, 2008

Medical negligence claim results in compensation payout

A woman who launched legal action after her son was prescribed the wrong medicine has been awarded £1,400 in compensation.

Joshua Donnelly, three, needs to take the anticonvulsant medicine Topamax for his epilepsy, the Evening Gazette reports.

However, after he had been taking the medicine for several days, he became unwell and had to be taken to hospital.

His mother Shirley Holt, 45, noticed after breaking a capsule up that there seemed to be too much powder and it emerged that the pharmacist at Harry Hill chemist in Billingham had mixed up his usual 15mg capsules with 50mg ones.

Although Joshua has now fully recovered, Ms Holt took legal action against the chemist and won a payout, although the firm did not admit liability.

Commenting on the episode, Ms Holt said: "If I hadn’t noticed when I did, who knows what would have happened? It is scary. I am very angry over it. I will never go back into his shop again."

Clinical negligence occurs when a professional in the health service provides care that is deemed to be below standard and this causes physical injury, death or distress.
ADNFCR-1694-ID-18794621-ADNFCR

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace