Paramedics Delay in Taking Patient to Hospital Results in £10,000 Settlement for Widow

May 20th, 2011

In 2002 *Mr Smith* began to suffer from breathing difficulties and irregular heartbeats. He visited his GP on a number of occasions and was referred to hospital. The hospital carried out an ECG and it was confirmed that Mr Smith did have irregular heartbeats but there was no explanation given for this. He was prescribed beta blockers which settled the symptoms.

However, later that year Mr Smith was again admitted to hospital with similar symptoms but much worse. Tests were carried out and Mr Smith was diagnosed with emphysema. Mr Smith was taken off beta blockers and put on alternative medication to help with breathing. He was also referred for sessions with the respiratory doctor every six months.

In August 2003 Mr Smith was referred to the cardiology department as he was suffering severe pain in his heart. Another ECG was carried out and showed that he was suffering sinustachycarida due to using a broncodilator. Medication was given to alleviate the symptoms.

In Summer 2007 Mr Smith had his last appointment with the respiratory doctor and was informed that he would need oxygen at home to assist his breathing.

In December 2007 Mr Smith suffered a chest infection and was admitted to hospital for a period of four days where he was given antibiotics and had tests which again showed an irregular heartbeat.

In Mid January 2009, Mr Smith returned to hospital suffering a further chest infection for which he was prescribed antibiotics. A chest x-ray was carried out and did not show any abnormalities.

In June 2008, Mr Smith was having great difficulty breathing and his wife telephoned for an ambulance. The paramedics examined Mr Smith at his home and refused to take him to hospital, advising that he should carry on with his antibiotics and oxygen.

Two days later, Mr Smith awoke in a worse condition. He was so weak that he could not dress himself and was fighting for breath. An ambulance was called and he was taken to hospital by the paramedics. Mrs Smith was advised that Mr Smith should have been taken to hospital two days previously when Mr Smith had first become ill.

Mr Smith underwent a number of tests and investigations and was diagnosed with a weakness of the heart muscle, which was slightly enlarged. Mrs Smith was advised that Mr Smith was in a critical condition and his condition was advanced. Two days later scans were carried out which showed that Mr Smith’s organs were failing and the machine supporting him was shut down.

Mrs Smith made a written complaint to the Ambulance Trust who responded admitting that the paramedics should have taken Mr Smith’s condition more seriously and carried out tests when they were first called out to him in June 2008.

Mrs Smith contacted Ian Kirwan, a specialist in clinical negligence matters at Pryers Solicitors, in December 2008.

Investigations commenced and a medical report was obtained from a Consultant Cardiologist which was not supportive. However, the admissions made following Mrs Smiths complaint were used to put allegations to the Ambulance Trust. The Defendant responded admitting that Mr Smith should have been taken to hospital two days earlier, but denying that this had any effect on Mr Smith’s health. An offer to settle was made for £10,000 which Mrs Smith was happy to accept.

The Defendant also paid all of Mrs Smith’s legal costs so she kept 100% of her compensation

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace

Man in skip fall to receive £1m in compensation

July 1st, 2009

Man in skip fall to receive ٟm in compensation

A man who was left with brain damage after he fell into a skip is to be awarded more than £1 million in damages.

Idris Smith, 57, was working for LC Window Fashions as a truck driver and factory operator in August 2004, Wales Online attests.

He lost his footing while loading up waste material and fell into a skip. As a result, he sustained a permanent change in his personality, with poor memory, reduced concentration and low tolerance.

Mr Smith is now unable to work and, with the help of his family, he took legal action against the firm for injuries and lost earnings.

LC Window Fashions admitted liability and Judge Justice Cranston this week ruled that he should be awarded the full amount of loss of earnings claimed to the age of 65, which will amount to more than £1 million.

Mr Smith’s solicitor said the money will allow him to move to a specially adapted home and live a relatively normal life.

Victims of brain damage usually receive more compensation than other personal injury victims as the cost of their long-term care must be covered.

ADNFCR-1694-ID-19244907-ADNFCR

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace

£400k compensation for industrial disease victim

May 20th, 2009

𧹈k compensation for industrial disease victim

A man who is dying of terminal lung cancer after being exposed to asbestos as a teenager is to be paid £400,000 compensation.

David Smith, now 56, worked as an apprentice for Associated Electrical Industries at Trafford Park maintaining street lights when he was 15, the Manchester Evening News reports.

It is thought that this was the place where he was exposed to the deadly building fibres.

"I had no idea what we were working with could be so dangerous. We had no protection from the dust, it used to fall on me all the time," said Mr Smith.

He became ill in 2007 and was told he only had another 12 to 15 months to live. To provide for his family after his death, Mr Smith launched legal action against Associated Electrical Industries, now Alstom Energy.

The company has now agreed to a compensation settlement of £400,000 for Mr Smith, but declined to comment on the case.

Earlier this month, it was reported by Get Reading that the widow of a labourer, George Sharpe, is seeking compensation after his death from asbestos-related cancer.
ADNFCR-1694-ID-19178654-ADNFCR

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace

Compensation paid to widow of lung cancer victim

February 12th, 2009

Compensation paid to widow of lung cancer victim

The widow of a man who died after being exposed to asbestos has secured a payout of £700,000 after it was ruled that her late husband’s employer was responsible.

Susan Smith launched legal action against the Co-Op in Leicester, where Michael Victor Smith had worked as a foreman, the Burton Mail reports.

She claimed that Mr Smith’s work on ceiling tiles had led to him breathing in asbestos dust, eventually culminating in his death from mesothelioma in 2004.

Judge Oliver-Jones QC ruled that the employer was negligent in that it did not protect Mr Smith from the dangers of exposure and agreed to the compensation.

In related news, Gordon Brown announced this week that there will be an announcement "very soon" regarding compensation and pleural plaques.

Pleural plaques are damage to the inside of the lung and they can lead to mesothelioma. It has been argued that sufferers should have better access to compensation.


ADNFCR-1694-ID-19022224-ADNFCR

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace