£80k payout for promising rugby player affected by misdiagnosis

September 15th, 2009

£80k payout for promising rugby player affected by misdiagnosis

A man who may have gone on to play rugby for his country has been awarded compensation of £80,000 after an injury and a subsequent misdiagnosis cut his career short.

The unnamed man, now 23, suffered a scaphoid fracture to his wrist during a game when he was 16. Although he was taken to hospital in North Devon, medics failed to spot the injury and told him to simply rest.

By the time the fracture was spotted by a GP five months later, further damage had been done and the victim needed a bone graft and three operations.

He lost his chance to play rugby professionally and still suffers from pain in his wrist.

The man decided to pursue a compensation claim because the hospital should have offered an X-ray a week after the accident in order to make sure there was no scaphoid fracture present.

In a new development, the hospital has agreed that it was negligent in not calling him back for further treatment and agreed to a payout of £80,000.

According to Arthroscopy.com, scaphoid fractures must be treated relatively quickly because pieces of broken bone, which are loose inside the wrist joint, will eventually cause a deterioration of the wrist joint called traumatic arthritis if the injury is left.

ADNFCR-1694-ID-19361271-ADNFCR

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace

Woman secures compensation after misdiagnosis of broken hip

May 18th, 2009

Woman secures compensation after misdiagnosis of broken hip

A woman whose GP failed to diagnose her broken hip on eight separate occasions has secured compensation for his negligence.

Sheila Brown, 67, fell near her home in Blackley and called Dr Amar Ranote for a home visit a few days later, the Manchester Evening News reports.

He prescribed painkillers and told her to call again in a month if the pain had got worse. She did this, but was again sent home.

It was not until she had been back seven times that her granddaughter decided to go with her and demand an x-ray.

A broken hip was then diagnosed and Ms Brown had a replacement operation at North Manchester General Hospital.

She took legal action against the GP for the pain she suffered and has now secured an undisclosed sum in compensation.

Anyone who suffers as a result of any kind of misdiagnosis, which would not have happened had the original treatment been correct, may be eligible for a payout in a similar vein to Ms Brown and should seek the advice of a solicitor specialising in clinical negligence claims.
ADNFCR-1694-ID-19174048-ADNFCR

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace

Hip op patient receives compensation after pin is left in

May 7th, 2009

Hip op patient receives compensation after pin is left in

A man has received £4,000 in compensation after a piece of medical equipment was left inside him following an operation.

David Bould, 54, went into the University Hospital of Hartlepool in April 2008 to have his hip replaced due to general wear and tear.

Originally, it was thought that the operation had been a success. However, an x-ray revealed that the guide pin had been left inside Mr Bould’s body.

He had to go for another operation to have the equipment removed, which he claims caused him unnecessary suffering.

"To be told that they had made a mistake and would have to operate again was a huge shock," he commented.

Mr Bould took legal action against North Tees and Hartlepool NHS Foundation Trust and has now secured £4,000 in compensation. A spokesperson said procedures have now been changed to avoid such incidents happening in the future.

Anyone who has suffered as a result of a medical practitioner not exercising what is seen as a normal standard of care and skill may have good grounds for a clinical negligence claim.
ADNFCR-1694-ID-19158481-ADNFCR

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace

Patient sues hospital for x-ray blunder

December 22nd, 2008

Patient sues hospital for x-ray blunder

A woman is taking legal action against a hospital which she says was negligent in its treatment of her injuries.

Patricia Griffiths, 65, fell at her home in November 2005 and was admitted to Addenbrooke’s Hospital in Cambridge.

Although x-rays showed up a fractured vertebra in her neck, doctors failed to notice damage to some of the others.

She was discharged with a follow-up appointment three months later, but had to be readmitted after only two months due to a dislocated vertebra and partial dislocation of two others.

Ms Griffiths had to have surgery and claims her life has been ruined by the injuries which left her unable to lift with her right arm.

She is suing the hospital for £300,000 for alleged negligence, in that they did not ensure her neck was stable before discharging her.

A spokesperson for Addenbrooke’s refused to comment.

Clinical negligence occurs when a professional in the health service provides care that is judged to be below standard and this causes physical injury, death or distress.

ADNFCR-1694-ID-18941415-ADNFCR

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace

Hospital fined after worker exposed to dangerous chemical

August 19th, 2008

Hospital fined after worker exposed to dangerous chemical

A hospital has been issued with a fine following an incident in which a worker was exposed to a dangerous chemical while cleaning an X-ray film processor.

The employee had been dealing with the processor for several years without taking the necessary precautions and had consequently come into contact with gluteraldehyde, which can cause irritation to the skin, eyes and throat, as well as problems with the lungs and respiratory system.

During a recent hearing at Boston magistrates’ court, United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS trust was ordered to pay £18,500 plus costs of £3,504 after pleading guilty to health and safety breaches.

"Employees should always be made fully aware of precautions to prevent this type of exposure, which could have resulted in long-term health problems for the employee," stated Health and Safety Executive inspector Jo Anderson.

The health trust risked the health of the worker in question by failing to properly identify the danger in this case, she added.
ADNFCR-1694-ID-18738159-ADNFCR

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace